Thursday 11 December 2008

Would We Beat the Invincibles?

The simple answer is no; in our current form we wouldn't stand a chance. However there are times when this side can produce some stunning football, like when we beat Man Utd. When we do so we are capable of beating anyone on the planet. But in order to see if we would be able to beat the 49rs on our best day, let's look at the two styles.

First, an analysis of the Invincible's style: The style at the time was a quicker, if less attractive, style of play. Play could be built up slowly through the center when Bergkamp dropped into midfield to become a playmaker, but most of the time our play went wider. We had two excellent wingers, Pires & Ljungberg, and the worlds best left back at the time Ashley Cole (I hesitate to spew forth ugly names for him here out of respect for the fact that he was once a decent human being).

Balls were won back by Viera, Gilberto, Edu, or Petit, and then passed quickly out to the wings where our wide midfielders would race by opposing players by either speed, skill, or an overlap from a fullback. The wingers would then drop in and cut towards the goal. And with Henry drifting out as well to collect balls, a one-two would be performed between Henry and either Pires or Ljungberg in which the attacking winger would then be in on goal and score.

This doesn't even mention the counterattacks. As soon as we won the ball in our own half the ball would immediately be played back and forth between our wingers and speedy central players until the ball was into the opposing penalty area in a matter of seconds, where a player who had run his legs off to get down the field would duly arrive and tap it in.

I can still remember it now: "Arsenal collect the ball from the corner, Viera out to Pires. Back to Viera, out to Ljungberg. Arsenal racing forward now, Henry. Out to Pires, back to Henry, played to Ljungberg, in on goal, cut back to Henry, AND HE SCORES!!!" It took a matter of 15 seconds. Do you remember it as well?

As the Invincibles were broken up and new young players came through the system, our style of play changed to what it is now (for reference, watch the second leg against Milan last season at the San Siro for a perfect example of our current system). Let's discuss just what it is now.

Now our build up play is slower. Instead of breaking down the wings at speed, we tend to want to work it down the middle. With our new style, we keep possession a lot better than the invincibles. A feature of our neat passing game is the neat passing triangles that are formed every few seconds in various shapes and places on the pitch. We work the ball down one side and if no openings occur then we pass back, start over the triangle passing and work it down the other side.

We slowly keep possession and probe for openings, the play being dictated by the brilliant Cesc Fabregas, until we finally split the defense and race in on goal.This style inherently scores less goals, but is much more attractive and can produce some stunning football.

Don't get me wrong, we still score boatloads of goals on our best days, but the style is less quick and more technical. Often our players get so into the passing game that they are afraid to shoot from distance but instead want to score the perfect goal, or walk it into the net. This is sometimes our undoing, and was during the barren years of 05-06 and 06-07 in which we made no challenge for the title. The team is now less afraid to shoot and slightly more direct, but it still occasionally falls victim to the walk-the-ball-into-the-net syndrome.


So there we are, the two styles in contrast. One could very well argue that our current style is far inferior to the incvincibles style - a judgement based on number of trophies - but Arsene Wenger believes that the current style is more attractive, more Arsenal. Arsene has said that the team now plays with the style he has been trying to implement since the beginning of his career, but I'll leave it up to you, the reader, to decide if this style is better or worse than the invincibles; we certainly haven't been winning any more trophies!

Thanks for the read, or re-read if you've been a long-time reader (I posted this article back in October), and don't forget, you can get now all the Fab 4 Arsenal news and views sent direct to your mobile phone for free, Click Here for details. Until next time,

Fab 4

5 comments:

  1. The style of play from the Invincibles was brilliant and attractive. Yes they held the ball for shorter periods compared to last season but that's because the support was so devastating. In full flow they may have even been better than last years crop because of the speed they attacked at with great passing and efficiency.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We would never be able to beat The Invincibles but it's not because their game was better, it's arguably very similar, it was because their players were better at the overall game. Let me say first by saying better I mean they understood the game on average more than the current crop does now. Let me take an example - Bobby Pires - excellent player, slow but extremely intelligent and technical. Where is out Bobby Pires now? Nasri is supposed to be a Pires replacement but their games are totally different. At one time Pires held the record for goals scored by a midfielder at 15 for the season and I remember the season he did that and alot of his goals came from knowing where he needed to be. Where is the player who could sneak into the back post and tuck one away like Pires used to do or know where he needed to be to get on the end of a rebound? We don't have that kind of player anymore and anything we do we have to take on a whole defense rather than craft our way through. Henry was the quintessential forward for Arsenal's type of play and Adebayor almost started to look like him last season where he was just unpredictable but effective. How many shots now has been scored outside of the box by our forwards this season? Now try to recollect how many times you've seen Henry just take a chance from the outside to find the back of the net. You never knew what Thierry would do but now unless the ball is in the box it's never going to be a shot on goal. While I am confident the current team will show promise in time, The Invincibles only come around once in a lifetime and that team had the right set of people, at the right club, at the right age, with the right amount of experience. It's as if planets aligned.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i think it's a total myth that this current team plays anything like as attractive football or that we keep possession better.

    the invinsibles often won games early and much of the rest of the game was just keeping possession. don't you remember the days back then when 2-0 up after 20 minutes they'd be playing 1-2s around the halfway line and the crowd would shout with each successful pass after around 15 in a row. that used to happen ALL the time, now it happens rarely ever. also i think you're being kind on this team and harsh on the old boys if you think we now play more attractive football. i simply remind you of the performance against everton (4th and doing great at the time) at the end of the season. best damn performance of any team i think i'll ever see and they played at level reasonably regularly or not far short of it. nowadays we put in the occasional big performance against a big team and that's almost it. even then our performances weren't THAT good against chelsea and utd, both teams made a lot of mistakes in the utd game. if they hadn't been shit in front of goal we'd have lost. and we could have scored 4 if we hadn't been shit in front of goal.

    ReplyDelete
  4. and i think it's wrong to say this team when you mean last season's team.

    this season we are a shadow of what we were last season even if there are only a few major changes. we have no balance, not enough creativity, everyone playing poorly and no flamini to tie everything together.

    if we had kept the same team as last season and added to it we would be amazing now and right at the top, not struggling against crap teams all the time

    ReplyDelete
  5. they were invincible no1 could beat them! viera would murder our midfield and sol campbell would dominate our attackers with their lack of creativity

    ReplyDelete

Post your comments here...